Lee County is voting now Check real time voter turnout numbers Find your district Get to the polls
Why should you care? See what your vote actually decides
Follow the Money

Who's funding your School Board?

An independent, non-sponsored look at who is backing each Lee County School Board candidate, their donors, the special interests behind them, and where the money overlaps. Built entirely from public campaign-finance records. Click any candidate to see their donors.

An Open Letter to Whoever Holds These Seats

Monday night, seven people vote on a tentative $3.12 billion budget. Four of those seats are on the ballot two weeks later. This letter is for whoever ends up elected on the school board August 18, about what we believe the voters elected them to protect and who we believe they were actually elected to protect it from. Our fact-check rides at the bottom.

By Amber Cebull and Ali Olivo · July 29, 2026

This is written to seven seats, not to seven people, because we do not know yet who will be sitting in all of them. Four are on the ballot August 18. Whoever wins them inherits the same budget book, the same buildings, and the same hundred thousand students. The letter applies either way.

We want to start with the part where we agree with you.

Almost everyone who runs for a school board seat believes they are running to protect children. In this county that belief usually gets described as saving kids from something, and the something is almost always said to be inside a classroom. We respect your need to protect the children of the district. We are just asking you to check where the danger is actually coming from.

It is not the woman buying her own laminating pouches

As of our last measurement on July 22, 171 Lee County classrooms had posted public wishlists asking for about $103,702 in supplies, against roughly $3,382 the public had bought so far. Read the lists sometime. Paper. Pencils. Snacks for kids who come to school hungry. Sensory tools. Books. On July 21 a teacher stood at your podium holding photographs of exposed sharp metal edges on aging desks and asked why new furniture was allocated to only six schools.

See for yourself: The teacher wishlists: what Lee County classrooms are asking strangers to buy

That is who keeps getting cast as the risk to children in this county's politics. Meanwhile the tentative $3.12 billion moves, on Monday, in one vote.

The people worth protecting a child from are rarely in the building

They are in the procurement file. A vendor riding a piggyback contract. A renewal with hidden fine print. A company that spent years lobbying for the program that now runs inside your schools. An operator that collects its fee whether or not the campus it promised ever opens, which is not a hypothetical here: a charter operation enrolled Fort Myers families off Gladiolus Drive and hired teachers, then emailed those families at 4:11 p.m. on the last day of that school year to tell them it would not be opening that August after all. It still has not opened.

Not one of them stands in front of children. Every one of them is in the budget you vote on.

The receipts on that one: What Is Best for Our Kids: the charter operation behind the Gladiolus Drive campus that never opened

You have something the public does not

A parent gets three minutes at a podium, after filling out a card, on an item that was already placed on consent. You get the workshop, a finance office, a legal office, staff who take your call, and the standing to ask any question you want out loud until somebody answers it.

The superintendent's team hands you a document. Receiving it is not the job.

Why is the district spending more than it is taking in? Why is there not a strategy to address how the district plans to address the decline in enrollment? Florida law lists twenty-nine categories of responsibilities of a school board. Instructional materials is one, but indoctrination is not a line in that statute. The budget, the buildings, the buses, the contracts, the personnel and the audits are, and that is the job on Monday and beyond.

Ali Olivo

So here is what we believe should be asked

None of that is a gotcha. Every figure comes out of the district's own published book, which discloses most of these pressures itself. Whether anybody reads them out loud is a separate matter, and that part belongs to voters.

Nine hundred and seventy-five positions

That is the drop in budgeted positions across all funds, about 533 of them in teaching. The district counts positions in full-time equivalents, which is why its table runs to decimals. A half-time counselor is 0.5, not half a person. Part of the drop is federal grant money not yet booked at the tentative stage and we will say so plainly. Part of it is not: the district issued 457 non-renewals in May, 275 of them teachers.

Then look at who absorbs the rest, and look at it as a share of what was there, because that is where the shape of this shows. Paraprofessionals down 253.81 positions, a cut of 16.85 percent. Security specialists down 25.76, or 15.51 percent. Social workers down 5.40, or 9.78 percent. Psychologists down 3.60, or 8.74 percent. School counselors down 8.92, or 5.65 percent. The budgeted line for media specialists goes from 4.00 positions district-wide to 2.76, a cut of 31 percent. Four of those six lines are cut proportionally harder than teaching, which falls 9.31 percent. Counselors and psychologists are not, but they are being trimmed off a base so small that the percentage is the least of it. Those are the adults a child gets walked to when something has gone wrong at home, or in a hallway, or in their own head. Cutting the position does not cut the need. It moves the need onto a classroom teacher who already has more students in the room and is buying snacks and supplies, and it moves the district's exposure along with it.

Now measure what is left against the standards those professions set for themselves. The 148.98 counselors in this budget come to roughly one for every 680 students. The American School Counselor Association recommends one for every 250, and the national average last year was 372. The 37.60 psychologists are roughly one per 2,700, against a recommended one per 500. The 49.80 social workers are roughly one per 2,000, against a recommended one per 250. Those ratios use your own enrollment projection of 101,803, which includes charter students who are staffed separately, so the real number inside your buildings is somewhat better than that. It is not better enough to change the sentence.

Related: A Lawyer in the Room: what the July 21 vote revealed about liability

What the rest of us are actually buying

I have lived in and loved this community for many years. I want it to thrive. People come here for the beaches, the paddling, the waterways and the rivers, and I want the state to retain the reason that people come. I want us to grow sustainably. Education directly impacts the desirability for others to buy and live in Southwest Florida. The better the infrastructure surrounding public education, the more we can attract people to our fine state.

Amber Cebull

Anyone who has moved a family knows the order of operations. School ratings get pulled up before listing prices do. Employers run the same search before they site a facility. Public education is infrastructure in the same category as roads and water, and it is the piece a family can evaluate from a thousand miles away in about four minutes.

So here is what turns up in that search. A district running school supply drives for pennies on the dollar, next to a capital plan that programs $802.8 million for new construction and $175.6 million to charter schools, and a charter operation off Gladiolus Drive that paid more than $10 million to its founder's own private companies. The taxpayers funding every line of that are the same people buying the pencils.

Ten years, then twenty

Some of you have children in these schools. Some of you have grandchildren who will be. Picture one of them at nine years old, in 2036, in a Lee County classroom, and then go looking in this budget for the line that decides what that room looks like. It is in there. It is being set this year.

Every school that opens in the next five years is already drawn in this plan. Eight of them, all in the East Zone, which is a defensible read of where this county is actually growing. Lehigh and Gateway are taking on families faster than the infrastructure around them can carry, in a place where the cost of living has gotten genuinely high. Alva has spent years fighting to stay rural. Both of those are true at once and both of them get settled inside this capital plan, by you, in the years you are sitting there.

Debt service climbs 42 percent next year and $501 million in principal will still be outstanding long after every term on this board has ended. Decisions with that kind of half-life do not get revisited; they get passed down as a legacy of sorts. Is this really what you want to leave behind?

Nobody is remembered for approving the agenda as presented. People can remember you for the debt you left behind, with our children's classrooms paying it down. Or they can remember you for putting those classrooms first, by protecting the positions our children actually meet every single day. The psychologists, the social workers and the counselors who help a kid navigate a system that was not built for everyone. The teachers finding new ways to make sure no student gets left behind. The paraprofessionals, the bus drivers, the cafeteria staff, and everyone in between. That is what is available Monday, and it is available whether the vote lands 7 to 0 or 4 to 3, because the record of who asked is kept separately from the record of who won.

Monday

The tentative budget hearing is August 3 at the Public Education Center on Colonial Boulevard. Schools open August 11. Students get counted August 28. The binding version of all of this is adopted September 8. Monday is the night the public finds out what you believe this money is for.

We are not asking anyone to vote no. We are asking you to make somebody explain it first, out loud, in the room, publicly, before the hand goes up. Adopting it as presented is also an answer. It is the one we will read back to you in September, and the one people will be carrying with them on August 18.

Before you go: The 2026-27 tentative budget, translated line by line

Fact check

Accurate on the figures, which are quoted from the district's own tentative budget book and reconcile to its tables. The piece makes no allegation of wrongdoing against any board member, employee or vendor. Two rhetorical moves are qualified below: the furniture arithmetic is an order-of-magnitude illustration rather than a calculation, and the claim that teachers are politically cast as a risk to children is opinion, not a documented statement by anyone on this board.

This op-ed is the opinion of Amber Cebull and Ali Olivo, both co-founders of Parents for Transparency, and the budget research underneath it was compiled by us. We are therefore checking material we helped assemble, and we have tried to be harder on it for that reason. It is an open letter, so most of it is argument rather than assertion. What can be checked is every dollar figure, every date, and the two characterizations that do real work in the piece. Both of those are flagged below rather than smoothed over.

Checked The School District of Lee County's 2026-27 Tentative Budget book (79 pp.) and its five-year capital plan, the July 21, 2026 BoardDocs agenda and meeting recording, section 1001.42 of the Florida Statutes, this site's own teacher wishlist canvass of July 22, 2026, the district's Fiscal Discipline page, and prior reporting by WINK News, WGCU, CBS and Florida Bulldog on the Gladiolus Drive charter campus.

The total tentative budget is $3.12 billion and the board votes on it August 3, with the final budget adopted September 8.

From the tentative budget book delivered to the board July 24, 2026 and its printed budget calendar: advertisement July 29, first public hearing August 3, schools open August 11, Day 14 count August 28, second hearing and final adoption September 8. The hearing is at the Lee County Public Education Center, 2855 Colonial Blvd.

171 Lee County classrooms had posted wishlists totaling about $103,702 still needed against about $3,382 purchased, as of July 22, 2026.

This is our own data, compiled from the teachers' own public lists on our Teacher Wishlists page and re-measured regularly; 158 of the 171 lists were measured at that count. Readers are entitled to be skeptical of us citing ourselves, which is why every underlying list is linked individually on that page. The description of contents reflects what is actually on them: paper, pencils, snacks, sensory items and books are among the most requested categories. For scale, Florida's classroom supply stipend was $300 per teacher in 2024-25.

A teacher addressed the board on July 21 with photographs of exposed sharp metal edges on aging desks, and six schools were named for furniture refresh.

From the July 21, 2026 meeting and the published agenda for item L-4, which authorized up to $4.3 million in furniture spending and named six refresh projects totaling $2,764,271: Estero High ($653,106), Cape Coral High ($647,279), Mariner High ($502,255), The Alva School ($403,330), Gulf Middle ($307,464) and Allen Park Elementary ($250,837).

Furniture rotation drops to $2 million a year against 96 schools, so the division is worth doing out loud.

The capital plan line reads $5,000,000 for 2026-27 and $2,000,000 for each of the next four years, and the 96-school count comes from the budget book's own facility list, excluding charters. The $460,000 average is ours, drawn from the six named July 21 projects, which range from $250,837 to $653,106. No district refreshes every building on a rigid cycle, and furniture is also bought through construction and grant budgets, so this is an order-of-magnitude illustration and not a schedule. The op-ed invites the board to do the arithmetic rather than asserting a result.

The capital-to-operating transfer is $52,196,466 next year, up from $45,394,174, and the half-cent sales tax supplying much of that capital revenue expires in December 2028.

Both transfer figures are printed in the budget book; the mechanism is Florida Statute 1011.71 and it is legal and common. The half-cent was approved by Lee County voters November 6, 2018 for a ten-year run beginning January 1, 2019. It is 27.1 percent of next year's $427,535,187 in capital revenue, and the five-year plan already shows it falling to a partial year and then to zero.

The Chief Staff Attorney's budget goes from $492,214 to $1,325,020 while the Board Attorney's goes from $1,509,231 to $526,771 and from three positions to two.

Quoted from the tentative budget's departmental tables. Combined legal spending is roughly flat, moving from about $2.00 million to about $1.85 million; what changes is which side of the organizational chart holds it. The district's own chart shows the Board Attorney reporting directly to the School Board and the Chief Staff Attorney reporting through the Superintendent. One caveat the op-ed does not state: a tentative budget is being compared against an amended one, and mid-year outside counsel spending can inflate an amended figure. The question the piece asks, whether the board voted on this, remains open either way.

Board policy sets a 3 percent reserve floor and a 5 percent goal, and contingency is budgeted at $30,600,000.

The policy language is printed on page 7 of the budget book. Three percent of general fund revenue is $30,649,962 and five percent is $51,083,269. Adding the $9,281,386 unappropriated balance puts the unrestricted cushion at roughly 3.9 percent.

The budget assumes 3,361 more funded students after headcount fell by 1,650, and the Day 14 count is August 28.

Funded enrollment is budgeted to rise from 108,717.12 FTE to 112,078.73 FTE. Actual headcount fell from 102,519 in 2024-25 to 100,869 in 2025-26. The two are not the same measure: funded FTE includes 11,661.75 voucher students whose money passes through the district. The book carries its own warning that if the students do not enroll these figures will reduce throughout the year, and sets aside $2,895,012 as a reserve for FTE shortfall.

Eight new schools are programmed over five years, all in the East Zone, with nothing for the South and West Zones; debt service climbs 42 percent and about $501 million in principal is outstanding.

From the five-year capital plan. Debt service rises from $71,050,046 to $100,768,569, a 41.8 percent increase, with interest alone going from $15.3 million to $32.4 million. Principal outstanding at the start of the year is approximately $501.1 million. The East Zone concentration follows where the district projects growth, in Lehigh, Gateway and Alva, which is a defensible planning judgment the op-ed does not dispute.

A charter operation enrolled Fort Myers families off Gladiolus Drive and hired teachers, then emailed families at 4:11 p.m. on the last day of school to say the campus would not open.

WINK News, June 4, 2024 reported the 4:11 p.m. last-day email and interviewed parent Nathan Williamson. Florida Bulldog, September 7, 2025 reported a further delay. The building is being handed to a different operator under a new name for 2026. No finding of illegality has been made against anyone involved, and the op-ed alleges none.

Teachers are politically cast as the risk to children while the budget goes unexamined.

This is the piece's central opinion and it is not a documented statement by any sitting Lee County board member. It characterizes the general shape of education politics in Florida as the authors read it. We checked the July 21, 2026 agenda for any item governing the content of teacher speech and found none. Readers who disagree with the characterization can discard it without affecting a single figure above, which is how an op-ed is supposed to work.

Budgeted positions fall about 975 across all funds and about 533 in teaching, with paraprofessionals down 254, counselors down 9, social workers down 5, psychologists down 4, security specialists down 26, and media specialists down to fewer than three district-wide.

These are budgeted positions expressed in full-time equivalents, not headcount, which is why the source table carries decimals and why the op-ed now quotes them unrounded rather than rounding to whole positions. The figures, with the percentage change on each: total personnel down 974.73 (8.20 percent), teachers down 533.40 (9.31 percent), paraprofessionals down 253.81 (16.85 percent), security specialists down 25.76 (15.51 percent), social workers down 5.40 (9.78 percent), psychologists down 3.60 (8.74 percent), counselors down 8.92 (5.65 percent), and media specialists from 4.00 to 2.76 (31.00 percent). On the comparison to teaching, the op-ed says four of the six lines are cut proportionally harder and names the two that are not, which is the accurate version: teaching falls 9.31 percent, so paraprofessionals (16.85), security specialists (15.51), media specialists (31.00) and social workers (9.78) are steeper, while psychologists (8.74) and counselors (5.65) are shallower. An earlier draft of this sentence claimed all six were steeper. That was wrong and was corrected before publication. One caution on that last one, which is why the op-ed says 'the budgeted line for media specialists' rather than a headcount: four certified media specialists across roughly 96 schools is implausible on its face, and the FY25 actual was 6.30, so this object code may capture only part of the role. Florida has a real documented decline in certified media specialists, but we have not confirmed that this line is the whole picture. Every other figure is quoted from the staffing table in the tentative budget: total personnel falls from 11,880.30 to 10,905.57 and teacher positions from 5,726.93 to 5,193.53. The district employed 5,884.08 teachers in 2024-25. The op-ed states the caveat that matters and we will restate it: a tentative budget is being compared to an amended one, and federal grant positions are booked only as grants are approved, so part of this gap is timing rather than a headcount decision. School staffing is trued up again at the Day 14 count on August 28, and the number to hold anyone to is the final budget on September 8. What is not timing: the district issued 457 budgetary non-renewals in May 2026, 275 of them teachers, and says on its own Fiscal Discipline page that some schools were allocated more positions than enrollment warrants. The characterization of what counselors, social workers and psychologists do is the authors' framing of those roles, not a district statement.

Florida law lists 29 categories of school board duties, and instructional materials is one of them.

Section 1001.42, Florida Statutes, enumerates 29 numbered subsections of district school board powers and duties. Subsection (9) is Courses of Study and Other Instructional Materials, and that duty is substantial: section 1006.28 makes each board responsible for the content of all instructional materials used in its schools and requires the searchable list and the parent objection process. The quote concedes this rather than minimizing it. One caveat readers deserve: section 1001.42 is not the entire universe of a board member's obligations, since other statutes also bear on instruction. Counting its categories shows the shape of the job. It is not a complete inventory of the law.

The capital plan programs $802.8 million for new construction and $175.6 million to charter schools, and the Gladiolus Drive charter operation paid more than $10 million to its founder's private companies.

The two capital figures are line items in the five-year capital plan printed in the tentative budget: $802,824,917 for new school construction and $175,624,079 to charter schools. The $10 million figure comes from reporting by Florida Bulldog and CBS on the Optima Foundation's payments to management companies owned by its founder, and is documented in our earlier op-ed on that operation, which is linked in the text. Placing these figures next to the wishlist total is a rhetorical juxtaposition, not an accounting identity: construction dollars and charter pass-through dollars are legally restricted capital and state money that could not be spent on classroom supplies. The point being made is about which needs get funded structurally and which get left to a supply drive, and readers should hold the comparison at that level.

Lehigh and Gateway are growing faster than surrounding infrastructure, and Alva has spent years fighting to stay rural.

The growth characterization matches the district's own planning: all eight programmed schools sit in the East Zone, and the district attributes that to growth in Lehigh, Gateway and Alva. The Alva statement describes a documented land-use fight, including sustained community opposition to a 1,099-home rezoning approved by the Lee County Commission in March 2025. That fight is at the County Commission, not the school board, and the op-ed does not claim otherwise. It is offered as context for where new schools go, and it is the authors' characterization of a community position rather than a formal resolution of any body.

The surviving counselors, psychologists and social workers leave Lee County far outside the ratios those professions recommend.

The position counts are from the tentative budget staffing table: 148.98 counselors, 37.60 psychologists, 49.80 social workers. The benchmarks are correctly stated: the American School Counselor Association recommends 250 students per counselor and reports a 372 national average for 2024-25; the National Association of School Psychologists recommends 500; the School Social Work Association of America recommends 250, a level no state currently meets. The ratios themselves are our arithmetic rather than a district or association figure, and the denominator is the weak point. We used the district's own 101,803 enrollment projection, which includes charter-school students who are staffed by their own operators, so the true ratio inside district-run buildings is better than the figures shown. The op-ed states that caveat on the page. We checked whether it changes the conclusion: at roughly 92,000 district-school students the counselor ratio would be about 1 to 617 rather than 1 to 680, still more than double the recommended level, and the psychologist and social-worker gaps stay several times the standard. One further qualification: these are professional aspirations measured against a budget line, and no Florida law requires any of the three ratios.

The public gets three minutes at the podium on items already placed on consent.

Accurate as a description of the district's public comment practice and of the consent structure: 76 of about 83 items on the July 21 agenda were on the consent agenda, voted as one block. Speakers submit a card and are allotted three minutes. Board members may pull any consent item for separate discussion, and one was pulled that night.

Fact-check sources

About the authors

Amber Cebull Amber is a Fort Myers native. Her two kids, 13 and 12, go to Cypress Lake Middle School. She grew up in Lee County schools herself: Tanglewood Elementary, Allen Park Elementary, Paul Laurence Dunbar Middle School's Gifted Program, Fort Myers High School's IB Program. She graduated from the University of Central Florida with a B.A. in English Literature and a minor in Psychology. An entrepreneur for 15 years, she has owned multiple businesses in the Fort Myers area, including a marketing and business strategy consulting practice and a brewery in Downtown Fort Myers.

Ali Olivo Ali is a Fort Myers mom with two kids, 12 and 9. She has served on the Golden Apple Selection Committee for the Foundation for Lee County Public Schools and on the United Way Allocations Committee. She has more than 18 years of experience in corporate business, M&A, and law. She holds a B.A. from the University of Florida and a J.D. from Marquette University Law School.

All op-eds from the community